Leaked Slides Shows the Core Ultra 9 285K will be Slower than the i9-14900K in Gaming

ultra9 285k performance 1 ultra9 285k performance 1

Leaked slides shows that Intel has acknowledged that its upcoming Core Ultra 9 285K processor will not outperform the existing i9-14900K in gaming scenarios. This revelation comes ahead of the official launch of the Core Ultra 200 series, scheduled for just two days from now. While the 285K is designed to be more power-efficient, it appears to lag behind its predecessor in terms of gaming performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K will average 261 FPS, compared to 264 FPS for the i9-14900K.
  • The new architecture allows for a significant reduction in power consumption, down to 447W for the 285K.
  • The 285K is expected to be up to 21% slower than AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X in certain gaming scenarios.

Performance Comparison

Recent leaks from Intel’s presentation slides reveal a detailed comparison between the Core Ultra 9 285K, the i9-14900K, and AMD’s Ryzen 9 series. Here’s a summary of the performance metrics:

Processor Average FPS Power Consumption
Intel Core i9-14900K ~264 FPS ~527 W
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K ~261 FPS ~447 W

ultra9 285k performance 2

The Core Ultra 9 285K is designed to be more power-efficient, consuming approximately 80W less than the i9-14900K. However, this efficiency comes at the cost of gaming performance, as the 285K struggles to keep pace with its predecessor.

Gaming Performance Insights

Intel’s internal testing indicates that the 285K only outperforms the i9-14900K in a handful of games, such as:

  • Warhammer 40K: Space Marine 2
  • Age of Mythology Retold
  • Civilization VI: Gathering Storm
  • F1 23

In contrast, it falls short in popular titles like:

  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Far Cry 6
  • Final Fantasy XIV

AMD Comparisons

When compared to AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X and 7950X3D, the Core Ultra 9 285K shows mixed results. While it may excel in productivity benchmarks, it is projected to be significantly slower in gaming, particularly in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, where it could be up to 21% slower.

ultra9 285k performance 3 ultra9 285k performance 4

Conclusion

Intel’s admission regarding the Core Ultra 9 285K’s gaming performance has raised eyebrows in the tech community. While the focus on power efficiency is commendable, the inability to surpass the i9-14900K in gaming could impact Intel’s competitive edge against AMD. As the launch date approaches, gamers and tech enthusiasts alike will be keen to see how the Core Ultra 200 series performs in real-world scenarios, especially in gaming environments where performance is paramount.

Via @wnxod